Category Archives: Employee

More Negative Sentiment for Homeownership

More Negative Sentiment for Homeownership.

by CalculatedRisk on 5/25/2011 09:51:00 AM

During the housing busts that followed the California housing bubbles of the late ’70s and late ’80s, there came a period when sentiment for homeownership changed. The evidence was anecdotal, but it was not uncommon to hear people say owning a home was “dumb”.

So one thing I’ve been looking for is a change in sentiment. Earlier posts on this with anecdotal evidence: Housing: Feeling the HateMore “Hate” for Housing, and More “Hate” for Homeownership.

A shift in sentiment doesn’t mean housing prices have bottomed – it just means the market is getting closer. In previous busts it seemed like negative sentiment lasted for a few years.

Last week Trulia and RealtyTrac released a survey of when Americans thought the housing market would recover. (ht Keith Jurow, Keith is far more bearish than I am bearish).

Here is the survey: Trulia and RealtyTrac Survey Reveals 54 Percent of American Adults Now Believe Housing Recovery Remains Unlikely Until 2014 or Later

As more cities across the nation experience double dips in home prices , more than half (54 percent) of U.S. adults believe recovery in the housing market will not happen until 2014 or later, according to the survey released today. In a previous survey conducted six months ago , 42 percent of American adults said they thought the market would turn around by 2012 or had already turned around. Now, only 23 percent continue to think this will happen.

When American Adults Believe Housing Market Will Recover
  Apr-11 Nov-10 % Change
Already Recovered[1] 5% 5% 0%
By the end of 2011 3% 10% -70%
2012 15% 27% -44%
2013 24% 24% 0%
2014 or Later 54% 34% 59%

Clearly there has been a sharp shift in when people think the housing market will “recover”. Expecting a recovery is somewhat different from asking when people will want to buy, but I think they are somewhat related – if non-owners think the market won’t bottom for several years, they would probably also say they won’t buy soon too. Just a little more evidence of a shift in sentiment …

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Employee, Home Sales

Buffett on Housing

Buffett on Housing.

by CalculatedRisk on 2/26/2011 12:24:00 PM

A few excerpts from Warren Buffett‘s annual letter to shareholders.

On Housing:

A housing recovery will probably begin within a year or so. In any event, it is certain to occur at some point.

He wrote the same thing last year:

[W]ithin a year or so residential housing problems should largely be behind us, the exceptions being only high-value houses and those in certain localities where overbuilding was particularly egregious.

Last year I disagreed, but now I think a recovery will probably “begin” within “a year or so”.

On Clayton (manufactured homes):

At Clayton, we produced 23,343 homes, 47% of the industry’s total of 50,046. Contrast this to the peak year of 1998, when 372,843 homes were manufactured. (We then had an industry share of 8%.)

CR Note: This is close to the record low for manufacturing homes set in 2009 of 49.8 thousand units.

Clayton owns 200,804 mortgages that it originated. (It also has some mortgage portfolios that it purchased.) At the origination of these contracts, the average FICO score of our borrowers was 648, and 47% were 640 or below. Your banker will tell you that people with such scores are generally regarded as questionable credits.

Nevertheless, our portfolio has performed well during conditions of stress. …

Our borrowers get in trouble when they lose their jobs, have health problems, get divorced, etc. The recession has hit them hard. But they want to stay in their homes, and generally they borrowed sensible amounts in relation to their income. In addition, we were keeping the originated mortgages for our own account, which means we were not securitizing or otherwise reselling them. If we were stupid in our lending, we were going to pay the price. That concentrates the mind.

If home buyers throughout the country had behaved like our buyers, America would not have had the crisis that it did. Our approach was simply to get a meaningful down-payment and gear fixed monthly payments to a sensible percentage of income. This policy kept Clayton solvent and also kept buyers in their homes.

… a house can be a nightmare if the buyer’s eyes are bigger than his wallet and if a lender – often protected by a government guarantee – facilitates his fantasy. Our country’s social goal should not be to put families into the house of their dreams, but rather to put them into a house they can afford.

Note: The worst performing mortgages originated during the housing bubble were NOT protected by a government guarantee, instead they were the product of the Wall Street driven originate-to-distribute model. But I agree with Buffett’s comments on how prudent lending “concentrates the mind”, and about putting people into homes they can afford.

Leave a comment

Filed under Employee, Housing

Oppose Employee Free Choice Act

 

Preserve Democracy: Oppose Employee Free Choice Act (H.R. 800/S.1041) 
Contact Congress Today!
 

The National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) gives private-sector workers the right to join or form a union and to bargain collectively over wages, hours, and working conditions. In order for a union to be acknowledged to represent workers, it must first demonstrate that it has the support of a majority of workers in the bargaining unit. Historically, the decision about union representation is made through a secret ballot election overseen by the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
 

Since fewer workers have opted for union representation through the traditional secret-ballot election, organized labor has begun employing “card check organizing.” This tactic bypasses an official secret ballot election and instead allows for recognition of the union as the bargaining representative once it presents authorization cards signed by a majority of workers that the union is seeking to organize. Since it may appear evident that a union enjoys a majority of employee support, current law allows employers to waive the secret ballot election requirement and recognize a union that produces signed cards from over 50% of the workers.

Unlike secret ballot elections, which ensure that employees can cast their votes confidentially and without enduring peer pressure or coercion from unions or employers, card check elections have been legally challenged on the basis of coercion, misrepresentation, forgery, fraud, peer pressure and promised benefits.

Despite the problems inherent with card check elections, some Members of Congress are championing legislation which would, in effect, codify card check organizing and effectively stop secret ballot elections. The Employee Free Choice Act (H.R. 800/S. 1041) would require the NLRB to certify a union – and prohibit a secret ballot election – if presented with signed authorization cards from a majority of employees that the union is seeking to organize.


Contact Congress Today!

If you go to the link below — Northeast Retail Lumber Association Capital Connection website -you can email or print letters to your elected officials. I encourage everyone to contact your elected officials about this important issue. 

http://capwiz.com/nrla/home/

Leave a comment

Filed under Capital Connection, Employee, Free Choice Act